Paper 1

 Question1 

  1. Only a few of thousands make the Olympics and to win a gold medal or even bronze is a one in a million. Many people dream of moments like these but few actually experience this. Bolt's experience was a memorable experience as even being the greatest sprinter of all time had no idea that he was gonna win the race until he won it. What leads up to the biggest race for these grown men is trash talk. Most of these men have never gone up against each other in their lives. Then Bang the shot went off to start the race, and Richard Thompson another great sprinter got one of the best starts out of the few but Bolt recovered quickly around 20 meters. Bolt then was second in the pack when his momentum built up and his stride led him past thompson. Bolt questioned himself asking where Asafa was. He then looked behind him and knew around 80 meters he was gonna win the race in the olympics for the 100 meter dash. All those months and years behind him for that shining brilliant gold medal. 

  2. In regards to my Newspaper report and the Autobiography written by Usain Bolt, they are 2 very different extracts written very differently. Firstly, starting off with a newspaper report. It is less in a first person perspective and more in a third person perspective describing someone else's feelings through what he is seeing. In the Newspaper article, you would describe Usan Bolt's experiences through ‘he and they’ whereas, in the Autobiography Usain Bolt is describing his feelings and actions in the few seconds of the 100 meter dash in the olympic races.

Nextly, An autobiography is structured to describe things in order  in a less formal way , as if someone was talking to someone else from a chatty point of view. The autobiography is describing what happened and what the actions that took place during the 100 meter dash. However, in the Newspaper article, it is supposed to tell the story of someone else and the purpose is a little more formal and can be less in order. The newspaper article has  a story talking to other people who would be reading the newspaper article such as people who want to know about sports and who won the race. In the autobiography Usain bolt is just telling his own story how he saw it not trying to tell anyone else saw it. 

Furthermore, talking about structure, an autobiography is more spaced out and is more descriptive on his own thoughts and what he thought going through the races from start to finish. In the Newspaper article it wasn't supposed to really describe anything its more of what happened and who won in a big paragraph just letting the reader know what is going on and what happened. 

The language described in the autobiography is more emotive and passionate about the story and what Usain is going through trying to make the reader feel what Usain Bolt is feeling. In the excerpt that I wrote in the newspaper article it was less descriptive and more explaining what happened to the certain people who were going through the 100 meter dash in the olympics. The language used in the autobiography was persuasive, trying to persuade the reader to feel Usain Bolt's passion to show readers what he did and felt when he won. My newspaper story was not persuasive at all and had no form of emotive language to anyone reading. It was more of an expository form of writing showing people the end point of the race during the olympics.

 


Comments

  1. 1(a)
    AO1 ⅗ marks. Shows clear understanding of the texts. Two of the main sentences that show clear understanding are ‘Bolt recovered quickly around 20 meters’ and ‘knew around 80 meters he was gonna win the race in the olympics for the 100 meter dash.’ These two show understanding as at the 20 meter mark is when Bolt made his comeback to win and at that 80 meter mark is where Bolt realized he won. Before the sentence, `Most of these men have never gone up against each other in their lives.’ You should add the list of people that competed in the race to show more detailed understanding of the text. I would also talk more about the actions of Bolt in the race rather than how the moment was very special. The most important part about the newspaper report is the actions Usain Bolt took in the race. The special moment could be put towards the end of the report in a sentence or two. This way you can get more detailed information in the report.

    AO2 ⅖ marks. The structure of the writing is not written like a newspaper report. It is just one paragraph when it is supposed to be short paragraphs listed from most important information to least important. There are a few errors, but they don’t impede on communication. In the sentence, “He then looked behind him and knew around 80 meters he was gonna win the race in the olympics for the 100 meter dash.” The word ‘gonna’ is unprofessional and would be used if you were texting a friend. I would use ‘going to’ as you want the newspaper report to sound more formal. One small error is that you didn’t capitalize ‘olympics’. You did a good job explaining the main idea of the Olympic 100 meter final and the actions that Bolt took.

    Overall score 5/10 marks.

    1(b)
    AO1 ⅖ marks. You show understanding of the language style and structure of both texts. You do a good job explaining the points of views in both texts, but it isn’t detailed or clear enough. You need to use examples from both texts to show how the points of views are used rather than just explaining. You show an overall understanding of the purpose and structure of the passage, but again you are very clear and detailed. You should use specific examples of structure and word choice when describing language and structure. For example, short sentences, and how or why they are being used. You also talk about language and describe how it may be ‘persuasive’, but give examples of the word choice that shows that.

    AO3 4/10 marks. As said before you show understanding of the structure, language, and meaning however you don’t give examples and specific names. For example when you describe language, go into the word choice used and quote words like, ‘chill’, ‘dude’, ‘hell’, and ‘oh man’. Using these words as examples and then describing the expression they make would strengthen your answer. Another big thing is when you talk about structure make sure you mention what type of sentences there is, if there is repetition or onomatopoeia and any other structure forms. For example, a lot of the one liners used onomatopoeia, “Bang” and “Pow”. Just be more clear with your explanation and give examples to be more detailed.

    Overall 6/10 marks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AO1- question 1(a)
    ⅗ marks. Your writing provides a clear understanding of what was going on in the race and is easy to follow through with. Although, I feel that you should have added more descriptive detail on what had happened during the race instead of focussing on how people dream to earn this medal. For example you stated “What leads up to the biggest race for these grown men is trash talk.” I feel like this comment isn't needed and instead you could have added a more interesting hook. I also had noticed that you didn't give your paper a headline which since it is a newspaper article it needs one to help grab the reader's attention to make them want to find out more on your paper. The structure of your paper gives the impression that you werent too sure of your understanding of the paper. I had also noted a lot of capitalization errors, so just work on that and really deep read the next one we have.

    AO2- question 1(a)
    ⅖ marks. After looking through your paper your expression does not flow that well, and I noticed some errors. I feel that you didn't deep read like i mentioned before you stated “Bolt questioned himself asking where Asafa was.” I am kind of confused why you put this in your article because you didn't really know his thoughts, you were just watching the olympic race and judging it from that standpoint. So that is something I would work on. Your purpose was there as well as your ideas were shown, just little things I would make sure you work on as I listed above.
    Overall, 5/10 marks

    AO1- question 1(b)
    ⅖ marks. To start off, you did not fully follow the question. I didn't see anything written about the form of the paper, it seems you did the structure twice. I had also noticed that you have a semi- decent understanding because you didn't really go deep into explaining why you think what you think, it was more of a very simplified version of that, so make sure you include for examples and longer explanations to make your writing better and stronger.For example, you said “Furthermore, talking about structure, an autobiography is more spaced out and is more descriptive on his own thoughts and what he thought going through the races from start to finish.” You could have gone deeper into this and expressed what spaced out is and what was more descriptive, just to make your writing sound better.

    A03- question 1(b)
    4/10 marks. I had noticed that you didn't have a strong connection to the reader. As it states in the rubric “ Limited analysis of form, structure and/ or language, with limited comparison.” I feel that this bst suits because you could have gone more in depth with it and added form as I had stated before. I feel you could have done way better than this and that you didn't really try your best. Another example of something that I noticed needs work on is “The newspaper article has a story talking to other people who would be reading the newspaper article such as people who want to know about sports and who won the race. “ This is another thing that was a limited analysis. Just go into further detail.
    Overall 6/15 marks

    ReplyDelete
  3. Question 1a
    Ao1: Understanding
    Info on the text can be seen in the news report. You described how Usain Bolt felt and described what had happened during the race using detailed well written sentences. However it seems that the info seems like it is copied and pasted. There isn’t much original work. Meaning, the info given and re-writing it into your own format and structure to make it sound unique. For that I will have to give 4 marks for question a.

    Aot: Composition
    However, the creativity of the answer to this question lacks. The report sounds very bland and sounds like a professional summary rather than a report of what happened in full emotion. One thing that can help is looking for the audience. Your audience is someone who would read a sports article and want to feel the emotion as if they were there themselves. Also when you shared about Usain you wrote about him as if you could read his thoughts. As a news reporter you have give small details about what they said. This makes it sound realistic or you can use ‘he said this’. I would give this part of the question 2 marks

    Overall Marks for Question 1a: 6 Marks

    Question 1b
    Ao1: Understanding
    I could tell from the writing you knew the text. I saw this in the previous part. You know how they compare it and know what to do with it. You understood what Usain was going for when he was talking and what all the elements were when it comes to writing. I would give 9 marks
    Ao2: Analyzation
    You did much better on this part. You focused on point of view, language and structure. You also touched base on the purpose of both of the texts which was a good idea. Last but not least you understood what you were going for in your own paper and used the interview to compare it which was a smart move I wish I could have done better on. 4 Marks!

    Overall Marks for Question 1b: 13 Marks

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment